For Canadian practices outside Quebec
How to teach RBTs to write session notes: a method and QA checklist for supervisors
How to teach RBTs to write session notes comes down to a written standard, practice on fictional sessions and fast feedback on specific sentences. This guide gives supervisors a four-step method, a note-QA checklist and fictional before-and-after examples. “RBT” is how many supervisors search for this; the rest of the guide says behaviour technician, because job titles for unregistered staff matter in Ontario.
This page is information, not legal advice. Examples are fictional, and the Ontario title guidance links to the College pages we read on the date shown.
Last checked: 2026-10-08
Decide what a session note is for
A session note tells the next person what happened, links the session to the plan’s goals and records enough context that someone who was not in the room can follow it. It is not the data sheet: counts, prompts and trial results live in the data record, and the note points to them and explains what numbers cannot. It is also not the place for opinions about a family or the cause of a behaviour.
- For the supervisor: what was practised, how the client responded and what needs a decision.
- For the next technician: what to repeat, change or watch for.
- For the record: a dated, attributable account that fits the clinic’s documentation policy.
Teach one standard for behaviour technician session notes first
Before anyone drafts a note, give new staff a one-page standard that every note meets, short enough to use at the end of a session. Adapt this outline to your clinic’s policy and to the rules your supervisors’ regulators set.
- Who, when, where: the client, the date, start and end times, the setting and who else was present.
- Goals worked on: named as in the current plan, not paraphrased.
- What was done: the activities and arrangements, in plain words.
- How the client responded: observable behaviour with the prompt level used. Point to the data record for counts.
- Behaviours of concern: what happened before, during and after, described so that a stranger could picture it.
- Family communication: what the parent said or was told, attributed to them.
- Questions for the supervisor: anything that needs a decision before the next session.
Show the difference between a fact and a judgment
Most weak notes fail in the same few ways: opinion instead of observation, labels instead of descriptions, and copied text. Teach with side-by-side sentences rather than rules, and let the technician rewrite the weak column before they see the strong one.
| Weak sentence | What is wrong with it | A stronger version |
|---|---|---|
| “Maya had a great session.” | An opinion with no information about goals or responses | “Maya worked on two goals. On ‘request a break’ she used the break card independently in 3 of 4 opportunities; one needed a model prompt.” |
| “Rowan refused to work at the table.” | A judgment about intent, not a description | “At the table Rowan pushed the cards off twice after the first request to start. He returned to the task after a visual schedule prompt.” |
| “She was frustrated all morning.” | A guess about feelings | “She cried and covered her ears when the vacuum started, then calmed after moving to the quiet corner.” |
| “Mom says home was a disaster because of the new school.” | A cause the technician cannot know | “Parent reported two disrupted nights this week and mentioned the school change. No cause was identified. Passed to supervisor.” |
| “Same as last week.” | Copied text that hides what was different | “Goals unchanged. New today: first use of the picture schedule for transitions; two of three transitions needed a gesture prompt.” |
| “Talked to mom.” | No content and no attribution | “Told the parent about the two skills practised. The parent asked about snack routines; passed to supervisor.” |
All names and details are fictional examples, not client information.
Teach in four steps: model, co-write, draft, review
People learn to write notes by writing them against feedback, not by reading a policy. This sequence works in most clinics.
- Model: show an annotated note and the data behind it, and point out what each sentence is for.
- Co-write: draft a note together from a fictional session record, with the technician typing and the supervisor asking “how do you know?”.
- Draft: the technician writes notes for fictional or low-risk sessions first, then for real ones, and every note is reviewed at the start.
- Review and fade: move from reviewing every note to reviewing a sample once the technician has passed the checklist on several notes in a row, and keep spot checks afterwards.
A note-QA checklist for supervisors
Use the same checklist for every note so that feedback stays consistent. Set the pass criterion in writing, for example three consecutive notes that need no change to facts, so that moving to sampled review is a decision about evidence rather than a feeling.
| Check | A pass looks like | Common fix |
|---|---|---|
| Goals | Each goal worked on is named as in the current plan | Replace “worked on language” with the plan’s goal name |
| Observable language | Behaviour is described by what could be seen or heard | Rewrite labels such as “defiant” or “anxious” as actions |
| Prompts | The prompt level used is recorded where it affects the response | Add the prompt level beside the response |
| Link to the data | Counts are in the data record, and the note refers to them without contradicting them | Remove numbers that do not match, or correct the data record |
| Specifics | At least two details that could only belong to this session | Replace repeated phrases with what happened today |
| Behaviours of concern | Before, during and after are all described, with how staff responded | Add the missing part, and do not infer the function |
| Family communication | What was said, and by whom | Attribute each statement and flag anything for the supervisor |
| Scope | No diagnosis, no guesses about causes and no other clients’ information | Delete it, and explain to the author why |
| Timing | Written when the clinic’s policy says it should be | Agree a target and track late notes |
Give feedback that changes the next note
Feedback works when it is quick, specific and about one pattern at a time. Comment on the sentence, not the person, and show the rewrite. Use fictional notes whenever the whole team trains together, so that nobody’s real client is discussed in a group.
- Review the day’s notes within a working day, while the session is still fresh.
- Pick one or two patterns per note rather than every flaw.
- Offer a rewrite of the weakest sentence and ask the technician to rewrite another.
- Keep a simple log of the error types you return most often. Repeated patterns are training topics for the whole team.
Fix mistakes without hiding them
Technicians will make errors and will want to tidy them away. Teach the opposite habit: a correction should be visible. Agree the clinic’s method for late entries and corrections, for example a dated addendum that says what changed and why, and check it against your records policy and the documentation standards of your College or regulator. Do not overwrite the original in a way that removes it.
In TherapyCRM, a clinical record can be edited only while it is a draft or has been returned for changes. Once it is submitted, in review, approved or signed, it is locked, and a correction is made by creating an amendment instead of changing the original.
Choose job titles carefully in Ontario
In Ontario, section 8 of the Psychology and Applied Behaviour Analysis Act, 2021 bars anyone who is not a member of the College from using the title “behaviour analyst”, a variation or abbreviation of it, or from holding themselves out as qualified to practise as one. The College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario (CPBAO) says the Act took effect on 1 July 2024 and does not otherwise prohibit particular words in job titles, but that unregistered staff should consider how their status will be perceived.
CPBAO publishes no approved list of job titles. It gives examples of less ambiguous titles for unregulated staff: Supervised Instructor, Supervised Instructor-Therapist, Supervised Therapist and Supervised Interventionist. It also says that anyone not registered with the College as a Behaviour Analyst will not be able to use earned ABA credentials, such as BCBA or BCBA-D, or hold themselves out as one, and it asks employers whether anyone uses a variation of the restricted title, such as Behaviour Therapist. This guide uses “behaviour technician” as a plain description of the role, not as a title recommendation. Confirm the titles on your notes, signatures and website with the College before you settle them; the College encourages employers to seek legal advice for specific questions.
Official sources
- [ON-1] Psychology and Applied Behaviour Analysis Act, 2021, section 8. Restricted titles and holding out. Ontario e-Laws, read on 8 October 2026.
- [ON-2] CPBAO: frequently asked questions. Job titles for unregulated service providers and holding out. Read on 8 October 2026.
- [ON-3] CPBAO: questions to ask as organizations that provide behavioural services. Restricted title, credentials and no approved list of job titles. Read on 8 October 2026.
Where the note lives in TherapyCRM
In TherapyCRM, staff write SOAP-style notes beside the session record and the treatment plan version. A note follows a controlled path: draft, submitted for review, in review, approved and then published, with a return-for-changes step when the reviewer needs corrections. Approval does not publish a note; publishing is a separate step, and the practice controls what families see. Solo-practice settings can approve a note automatically on submission, while other practices need a real review.
TherapyCRM does not write the note for its author. Clinicians write and review the notes, and the software does not make clinical decisions.
Frequently asked questions
How long does it take to teach a technician to write session notes?
There is no fixed time. Move from reviewing every note to sampling when the technician has passed the checklist on several notes in a row, and write that criterion down before you start.
What should a technician leave out of a session note?
Diagnoses, guesses about causes or feelings, judgments about the family, information about other clients and copied text. Record what was seen and heard, the prompts used and what was said, and flag questions for the supervisor.
Do a behaviour technician’s notes need supervisor review?
Your clinic’s policy, your funders and each supervisor’s regulator decide. TherapyCRM supports a review path with a return-for-changes step, but it does not decide whether review is required.
What job titles can unregistered ABA staff use in Ontario?
CPBAO publishes no approved list. The title “behaviour analyst” is restricted, the College asks employers to avoid confusion, and it gives examples of less ambiguous titles. Check the titles you plan to use with the College.
Should technicians copy the previous session’s note as a starting point?
No. Copied text hides what changed and carries old facts forward. If a template helps, start from headings rather than sentences.
Can TherapyCRM write session notes for technicians?
No. Clinicians write and review SOAP-style notes in TherapyCRM, which keeps them beside the session data and the plan. The software does not make clinical decisions.
How should a technician correct a mistake in a note?
With a visible correction under the clinic’s records policy, such as a dated addendum, and not by deleting the original. In TherapyCRM, a locked record is corrected by creating an amendment, which leaves the original untouched.