Independent and assisted response review sheet

Review assistance definitions, opportunity counts and source observations without automatically selecting a prompting strategy.

Define what you are recording

This recording example compares responses with and without additional assistance across stated opportunities. The source record describes assistance precisely; the aggregate sheet does not choose or recommend a prompt hierarchy.

A fictional materials-sorting activity keeps response counts and notes about assistance. Changes in assistance are marked as a new observation phase.

Collect the data consistently

  • State what counts as access support versus additional assistance.
  • Keep each outcome in one category and preserve the opportunity total.
  • Label assistance changes and retain the detailed source record behind the summary.

How to complete each data sheet column

Use the stated units and distinguish an observed zero from a missing observation.

  • Date: Date of this observation. Use YYYY-MM-DD, for example 2026-10-09. Rows are ordered by date; equal spacing on the graph does not represent elapsed calendar time.
  • Target: Short fictional or de-identified label for the one activity being observed. Use the same target throughout this report; keep its agreed definition in your approved record.
  • Phase: Optional label for the observation conditions, such as Observation A. A change creates a chart marker; it does not demonstrate a treatment effect.
  • Independent: Whole-number count of opportunities with an independent response under the agreed rule. For example, 3 independent out of 5 opportunities gives 60%.
  • Prompted: Optional whole-number count of responses following the defined assistance. Keep these separate from independent responses; the two counts cannot exceed opportunities.
  • Opportunities: Total observed opportunities, including unsuccessful opportunities. Use a positive whole number. Independent and prompted responses must not overlap.
  • Notes: Optional observation context or recording limitation. Exclude names, contact details and other identifiable clinical information.

Fictional worked example

These are original fictional observations, not patient records or a treatment recommendation.

Independent and assisted response review sheet
DateTargetPhaseIndependentPromptedOpportunitiesNotes
2026-01-05Fictional prompt-fading-reviewObservation A348Fictional assistance definition A
2026-01-07Fictional prompt-fading-reviewObservation A438Definition A
2026-01-09Fictional prompt-fading-reviewObservation A338Definition A
2026-01-12Fictional prompt-fading-reviewObservation B529Assistance definition B; new phase
2026-01-14Fictional prompt-fading-reviewObservation B439Definition B
2026-01-16Fictional prompt-fading-reviewObservation B5310Fictional observation

Review and interpretation

Compare conditions explicitly. More independent responses after a change cannot alone show that the change caused the difference.

  • A binary prompted category hides important differences in assistance.
  • Removing needed access support does not prove independence.
  • The sheet cannot decide when support should change.

Questions for the clinical team

  • What detail describes each assisted response?
  • Which support remains continuously available?
  • Who decides whether a plan changes?

Further reading